The questions read: “Network the amount you to definitely top refers to just how almost certainly your own attitude towards homosexuals is similar to this new attitude your primary [ men / lady ] nearest and dearest possess toward homosexuals.” Both issues have been responded having fun with a beneficial 5-section measure between 0 (Absolutely nothing) so you’re able to 4 (A great deal). Past research has found these things to help you mirror respondents’ normative attitudes toward homosexual somebody (Herek & Capitanio, 1996). These items showed a great Cronbach’s ? out of .70.

Religiosity

I counted religiosity having fun with five items: (a) importance of spiritual otherwise spiritual opinions; (b) frequency out-of chapel or forehead attendance before 12 months; (c) volume so you’re able to incidents sponsored because of the the religious category in earlier times year; and you may (d) prayer volume in the past month. Requirement for spiritual beliefs was mentioned playing with a beneficial 4-part level ranging from step 1 (Maybe not crucial after all) in order to cuatro (Very important). The thing calculating participants’ attendance in order to a church or forehead in the during the last season realize, “How often perhaps you have attended a church or forehead regarding the prior season?” Users replied which because of the opting for one of the following the half a dozen kinds: Never ever, Several times per year, Once or twice a-year, Once or twice 30 days, Regular, and most regular. This new half a dozen address categories having chapel attendance was basically in addition to used in attendance so you’re able to backed spiritual events. Prayer frequency was analyzed having half a dozen categories: Never, Several times a month, From time to time 30 days, Two moments weekly, Daily, or maybe more than daily. Almost every other studies have made use of equivalent strategies from religiosity in their questionnaires and discovered these to getting continuously reputable (Herek & Gonzalez-Rivera, inside push). Religiosity facts got a Cronbach’s ? https://kissbrides.com/spanish-women/salamanca/ of .80 within research.

Perceptions with the Lesbians and you may Gays

The final area of the survey integrated the latest Foreign language-translation of your own modern type of the Thinking On the Lesbians and you will Gay (ATLG) Scale (Herek, 1984). This 20-product measure is responded having fun with good 5-point scale ranging from step 1 (Strongly disagree) so you can 5 (Highly agree). Respondents’ score is calculated by using the fresh new mean round the products such as for example that large scores echo far more bad attitudes to your homosexual people and you can ladies. Within the modern adaptation, the scale should be divided into several ten-product subscales: new Thinking to your Lesbians (ATL) therefore the Thinking for the Gays (ATG) subscales. I translated the latest ATLG level with the Spanish-vocabulary immediately after which back interpreted from Foreign language into the English to be certain equivalency between the two products. Spanish-talking Puerto Rican someone, exactly who volunteered in a great pre-decide to try pilot analysis, thought the effective use of words appropriate. Foreign language and English items of your own items’ posts is available from inside the Appendix Good.

Exploratory principle axis factor analyses with oblique rotation of the Foreign language kind of the latest ATLG Level got around three factors: a great Condemnation-Endurance Foundation (17 issues; %), a personal-Expressive Factor (you to definitely items; 6.75%), and you may a standards Foundation (several issues; six.51%). These types of three components explained sixty.9% of one’s total variance. The fresh new said variance of these products is very similar to those people received from inside the Herek’s (1984) brand-new study. After the Herek’s (1984) recommendation, we picked the things loading high merely to the part matrix of the Condemnation-Endurance foundation. Just after deleting 3 factors (issues 2, seven, 12), i decided to and additionally eradicate a supplementary item (goods 17) whilst decreased the fresh new scale’s accuracy significantly. New ATLG size concluded having 16-facts and you will told me 55% of your full variance. The item loadings for three factors was shown in Desk 1 .

Dining table step 1

Herek’s ATLG Scale could have been administered in almost any racial organizations through the the united states that have uniform Cronbach’s alpha coefficients more than .87 (Herek, 2000). Once the level got not ever been useful good Puerto Rican decide to try, brand new ATLG-Spanish variation showed precision scores (?=.93) the same as those people gotten from the Herek during the a keen undergraduate shot (Herek, 1996). To lessen the fresh new rising prices of one’s Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient due for the quantity of affairs, we parceled the newest 16 facts towards four substance score. For each get illustrated the new suggest value for every single four-item ATL and you can ATG indicator, respectively. Solution placement of products of the their score ordered foundation loadings was basically always include the evidence on ATG and ATL signs, respectively. All-product indications got a great .90 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.