Results
Pearson correlations involving the chief studies variables (the big Five dimensions, depressive symptoms, lifetime satisfaction and you may parenthood fulfillment) indicated that highest quantities of extraversion was indeed notably synchronised with high amounts of visibility to try out, lifetime satisfaction, and lower levels of depressive symptomatology (find Desk 2). Neuroticism and you can anxiety levels have been surely correlated. High neuroticism including was synchronised which have low levels out of conscientiousness, agreeableness, lifetime fulfillment, and parenthood satisfaction. Large amounts of conscientiousness was in fact synchronised that have lower levels away from depressive attacks and better degrees of lifetime pleasure. Furthermore, high degrees of agreeableness was indeed synchronised with lower levels away from depressive episodes and better levels of lives pleasure. Large quantities of depressive symptomatology was in fact coordinated having low levels from lifestyle pleasure and you will parenthood pleasure.
Pairwise contrasting indicated that homosexual people just who became dads as a result of surrogacy (Yards = nine
Correlations with the sociodemographic variables that served as controls in our study revealed that being older was significantly correlated with reports of worse physical health (r = ?0.28, p 2 = 0.055. When looking at the univariate effects (see Table 3), life satisfaction significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,176) = 4.827, p = 0.009, ?p 2 = 0.052. Pairwise comparisons revealed that gay men who became fathers through surrogacy (M = 5.31, SD = 1.16) scored significantly higher than heterosexual fathers (M = 4.70, SD = 1.39) on life satisfaction (p = 0.002), with no significant differences between gay men who became fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 5.18, SD = 1.08; p = 0.161) or between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.804).
Dining table step three. Multivariate Studies out of Covariance of Classification (Gay Fathers because of surrogacy, Gay Fathers by way of Heterosexual Relationships, and you may Heterosexual Dads) to possess Emotional Wellness Concomitants (Decades, Place of Birth, Financial Standing, Self-Ranked Health, Self-Rated Religiousness, Relationships Position, Quantity of Youngsters, Child’s Indicate Years and Child’s Residency Regulated).
Univariate effects also showed that parenthood satisfaction significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,176) = 3.556, p = 0.031, ?p 2 = 0.039. 34, SD = 0.90) scored significantly higher than heterosexual fathers (M = 8.27, SD = 1.72) on parenthood satisfaction (p = 0.018), with no significant differences between gay men who became fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 8.03, SD = 1.72; p = 0.870) or between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.216). The differences between gay fathers through surrogacy and heterosexual fathers on life satisfaction and parenthood satisfaction remained significant when Bonferroni corrections were applied.
Because the shown for the Dining table step 3, univariate effects simultaneously revealed that depressive symptomology don’t notably differed one of several three groups, F(dos,176) = 1.806, p = 0.167.
To test our very own prediction one gay dads as a consequence of surrogacy do statement large amounts of extraversion than simply possibly heterosexual dads otherwise homosexual fathers as a consequence of a beneficial heterosexual relationships, we used try this site univariate studies regarding covariance (ANCOVA) with post hoc pairwise evaluations. Analysis class (gay dads courtesy surrogacy; homosexual fathers that has be fathers courtesy a good heterosexual dating; and heterosexual fathers) supported as independent varying, extraversion offered as the oriented varying, and nine sociodemographic parameters discover in order to rather disagree amongst the fathers’ groups (years, host to delivery, monetary standing, self-ranked wellness, self-ranked religiousness, dating position, quantity of children, people suggest ages, and kid house) were used given that covariates.
The results displayed in Table 4 indicated that extraversion significantly differed among the three groups, F(2,179) = 4.182, p = 0.017, ?p 2 = 0.045. Pairwise comparisons revealed that gay men who became fathers through surrogacy (M = 3.64, SD = 0.72) scored significantly higher on extraversion than heterosexual fathers (M = 2.39, SD = 0.87; p = 0.006). Gay men who became fathers through surrogacy also scored significantly higher on extraversion than gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship (M = 3.50, SD = 0.69; p = 0.038). No significant difference was found between gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship and heterosexual fathers (p = 0.458). The differences between gay fathers through surrogacy and heterosexual fathers on extraversion remained significant when Bonferroni corrections were applied. However, the difference between gay fathers through surrogacy and gay fathers who became fathers through a heterosexual relationship was non-significant.